FEEDBACK ON ASL TRAINING PROGRAMME

To Be Filled in by the Observer/ Facilitator.

On a scale of 1 - 5 .

where 5-Strongly Agree; 4 - Agree; 3 - Partly Agree; 2 - Disagree; 1 - Strongly Disagree, please mark the relevant column.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT THE PROGRAMME

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1

2

3

4

5

1
The structure and organization of the programme was in accordance with its objectives.
2
How would you measure the success of the activities carried out by the trainers?
3
Was there sufficient interaction with the speaker(s)/faculty?
4
What was the general level of satisfaction among the participants?
WORKSHOP EVALUATION

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1

2

3

4

5

1
The workshop content was :
a. Relevant
b. Comprehensive
c. Easy to understand
d. Effective.
2
Workshop handouts:
a. Supported presentation material
b. Provided useful additional information
c. Were clear and well organized
3
The workshop was:
a. Well paced
b. Breaks were sufficient
c. A good mix between theoretical input and activities
4
The Resource Persons were RP1:
a. Knowledgeable
b. Well-prepared
c. Effective
d. Responsive to participant's questions
5
The Resource Persons were RP2:
a. Knowledgeable
b. Well-prepared
c. Effective
d. Responsive to participant's questions

SESSION WISE FEEDBACK

SESSION 1: Assessment of Speaking and Listening Skills.

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1

2

3

4

5

1
The rationale for ASL was explained well.
2
The concept of ASL and its importance was brought out well.
3
Mapping of CBSE objectives with CEFR was done effectively.
4
The Language Functions, Communication Skills and Phonology were taken up effectively.
5
All queries of the participants were addressed by the Resource Person(s) / Facilitator(s) satisfactorily.
6
The session was executed as planned in the Manual
7
General Comments (if any):
SESSION 2: Listening Skills

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1

2

3

4

5

1
The participants were made aware of the process of teaching listening for various purposes and situations
2
The procedure for conducting Listening Tests was explained well.
3
Step by step procedure of conducting the listening test was explained thoroughly.
4
The process of evaluation/marking scheme was clearly explained.
5
The session was executed as planned in the Manual
6
General Comments (if any):
SESSION 3: Speaking Skills

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1

2

3

4

5

1
The Resource Person(s) / Facilitator(s) was/were fully aware of ASL and clarified the need of Assessment of Speaking Skills.
2
The format of the speaking test was explained well.
3
The Procedure for conducting and assessing the speaking skills was reinforced in accordance with the Descriptive indicators given in the Manuals. (for classes IX & X).
4
The method for calculating Marks and the Grades was explained in accordance with the Manual (for classes IX & X).
5
The session was executed as planned in the Manual
6
General Comments (if any):
SESSION 4: Assessment of Speaking Skills

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1

2

3

4

5

1
1. How well did the participants understand overall rationale?
2
How will did the participants understand the rubrics
(a) Interactive Competence
(b) Pronunciation
(c) Fluency
(d) Language Accuracy & Range
3
Did all the participants fully understand the format of the speaking test process?
4
How well did the participants become conversant with the recording and uploading?
5
General Comments (if any):
SESSION 5: Overall Comments

S.No.

Feedback Questions

1
Do you have any suggestion for improvement of the 2-day training programme?
2
Were there any sessions which marked really well?
3
Were there any sessions which need revision?